« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: i am not familiar with vhc

By: bim24 in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 29 Jun 12 8:58 PM | 336 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 45644 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 45643 by postyle)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

it seemed from reading our cases, a stay at the district level was mandatory while the ITC was going on... but it doesn't seem to be the case... unless maybe the apple portion was stayed while the cisco, siemens etc went on and got a markman hearing.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: i am not familiar with vhc
By: postyle
in IDCC
Fri, 29 Jun 12 8:37 PM
Msg. 45643 of 48237

VHC has an active district court case with multiple defendants, including Apple, Cisco, Siemens, Mitel, NEC, etc. The ITC complaint made by VHC is only against Apple.

Unlike VHC, IDCC's parallel district case is stayed pending the ITC outcome.

From my understanding, ALJ's at the ITC usually do the claim constructions at trial and not in a separate, earlier Markman hearing.


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next