« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: csl

By: xcslewis in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 28 Jun 12 6:49 PM | 63 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 08692 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 08682 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

It was as positive a spin as I could muster as I turned the other cheek.

On the face of it, it stinks, but if it is in the shareholders interest, then the case to justify the decision even if it involves nominal cost, should be made.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
csl
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Thu, 28 Jun 12 6:04 PM
Msg. 08682 of 54959

it's tainted because it is a related party transaction. the company can say whatever it likes. but this deal was done because of the relationship.

that is the one thing they should avoid at all costs. especially as peter appears to be paid by both companies.

anyone who knows anything about public companies knows this. this is a line you do not cross.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next