it makes me think that they andy IDCC resolved the discovery and deposition matter. Or maybe not. Anyway if they wanted to move to quash they should have filed on June 25th, unless the ITC is late posting motions.
UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Before the Honorable David P. Shaw
Administrative Law Judge
In the Matter of:
CERTAIN WIRELESS DEVICES WITH 3G
CAPABILITIES AND COMPONENTS
THEREOF
Inv. No. 337-TA-800
NON-PARTY MICROSOFT CORPORATION'S UNOPPOSED MOTION FOR
AN EXTENSION OF TIME TO MOVE TO LIMIT OR QUASH
COMPLAINANTS' SUBPOENA
Pursuant to Rules 201.15 and 210.32 of the Commission's Rules of Practice and
Procedure, 19 C.F.R. §§ 210.15 and 210.32, non-party Microsoft Corporation ("Microsoft")
hereby moves for an extension of time to file a motion to limit or quash the subpoena duces
tecum issued by the U.S. International Trade Commission upon application made by
Complainants InterDigtial Communications, LLC, InterDigital Technology Corp., and IPR
Licensing, Inc. on June 5, 2012. Microsoft received the subpoena on June 6, 2012. Pursuant
to the subpoena any motion to limit or quash the subpoena is currently due on June 18, 2012,
and Microsoft is required to produce documents on June 15, 2012, or at such other time and
place agreed upon. Microsoft respectfully requests an extension of time to limit or quash the
subpoena until June 25, 2012.
-2-
Microsoft seeks this extension in order to conduct its internal investigation into the
issues raised in the subpoena. In addition, Microsoft seeks additional time to negotiate with
Complainants to come to a mutual agreement regarding the scope of the document requests
and deposition topics in an effort to avoid motions practice. Assuming that the parties can
reach an agreement regarding the scope of the subpoena, by June 25, 2012, Complainants
and Microsoft have agreed to set a date certain for production of documents. Accordingly,
Microsoft asserts that good cause exists to grant this extension.
Microsoft certifies that counsel for Complainants and the OUII do not object to
Microsoft's request for an extension. Microsoft has also contacted counsel for Respondents
and they do not object to Microsoft's request for an extension.
For the foregoing reasons, Microsoft respectfully requests that the Administrative
Law Judge grant Microsoft's motion for an extension of time to limit or quash Complainants'
subpoena to June 25, 2012.
Dated: June 14, 2012
Respectfully submitted,
By: /s/ Margaret D. Macdonald
Margaret D. Macdonald
Perkins Coie LLP
700 Thirteenth Street, N.W., Suite 600
Washington DC 20005
Telephone: 202.654.1000
Facsimile: 202.645.9944
Email: MMacdonald@perkinscoie.com
| 
