« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: We're going back to .... 

By: Rakitno in IDCC | Recommend this post (2)
Sat, 23 Jun 12 2:10 AM | 373 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 45594 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 45593 by zzfan)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Yes. There is a cost.

If a trader sells shares short and those shares pay a dividend, the trader is responsible for paying the dividend amount to the broker. The money the short seller pays is not the actual dividend but is a payment in lieu of dividend.

http://wiki.fool.com/Substitute_Payment_in_Lieu_of_Dividends

So an increase in dividend would hurt shorts. I have no problem with the share buyback and encourage it but if we're going to drift lower on low volume like today then the shorts are back at it and they need their costs to increase. A lower float only makes things easier for them with volatile movements until positive news is reached. We already have a dividend but like any tax, by increasing the dividend, we can reduce the shorts activity and encourage long term ownership.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: We're going back to ....
By: zzfan
in IDCC
Sat, 23 Jun 12 1:36 AM
Msg. 45593 of 48237

Whatever happened to the old saying that the shorts have to pay the dividends? Is that still accurate?


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next