« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: loop Re: My3 

By: robweis in IDCC | Recommend this post (1)
Thu, 21 Jun 12 8:34 PM | 333 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 45571 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 45567 by Data_Rox)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

DR: Delaware?

Yes. If the CAFC rules in NOK's favor, the stay of the Delaware case can go away and we can pursue action in Delaware in parallel with the current ITC action. I think.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
loop Re: My3
By: Data_Rox
in IDCC
Thu, 21 Jun 12 7:22 PM
Msg. 45567 of 48237

bring on Delaware?

If the ITC agrees to undertake a 337 investigation, the respondent/defendant should be allowed to make the required admissions and seek a determination of a FRAND royalty rate in another venue and the ALJ upon motion should stay the 337 investigation until the rate is set completing the formal licensing which would trigger the dismissal of the 337 proceedings or evidence is presented that the respondent is unduely delaying the rate setting action necessitating a removal of the stay. This would relieve the threat of a ban and accomplish the stated goal of the ITC to encourage resolution of disputes between US patent holders and those using the patent without agreement.


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next