« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Nokia lost on their motion to terminate the investigation against

By: bim24 in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 21 Jun 12 12:04 AM | 378 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 45560 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 45559 by DCLARKE)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

all these are just common defenses every itc case uses.

frand
invalidity
etc...


they throw them all hoping to stick on the wall but also to make sure they don't forfeit any in the future.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Nokia lost on their motion to terminate the investigation against
By: DCLARKE
in IDCC
Thu, 21 Jun 12 12:01 AM
Msg. 45559 of 48237

The point the ALJ is making is that you cant have it both ways. IMO, the ALJ says that how can you have an "agreement" based on ETSI declarations when you are saying that the patents are arguing on the other side that they are invalid or not being used etc. There was no basis for their argument and the attorney writing their moting knew that going in.

dclarke


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next