« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Nokia lost on their motion to terminate the investigation against

By: DCLARKE in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 21 Jun 12 12:01 AM | 291 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 45559 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 45558 by drwein72)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

The point the ALJ is making is that you cant have it both ways. IMO, the ALJ says that how can you have an "agreement" based on ETSI declarations when you are saying that the patents are arguing on the other side that they are invalid or not being used etc. There was no basis for their argument and the attorney writing their moting knew that going in.

dclarke


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Nokia lost on their motion to terminate the investigation against
By: drwein72
in IDCC
Wed, 20 Jun 12 11:25 PM
Msg. 45558 of 48237

Although Nokia did say that the only barrier to licensing was the FRAND rate, later in his opinion the ALJ stated that Nokia raised issues of validity, essential nature of IDCC's patents relative to the standards etc. It's hard to tell what exactly Nokia is claiming.


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next