Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Nokia lost on their motion to terminate the investigation against

By: drwein72 in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Wed, 20 Jun 12 11:25 PM | 323 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications 		Msg. 45558 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 45554 by my3sons87)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Although Nokia did say that the only barrier to licensing was the FRAND rate, later in his opinion the ALJ stated that Nokia raised issues of validity, essential nature of IDCC's patents relative to the standards etc. It's hard to tell what exactly Nokia is claiming.


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Nokia lost on their motion to terminate the investigation against
By: my3sons87 in IDCC
Wed, 20 Jun 12 10:04 PM 		Msg. 45554 of 48237

them. And in the filing they state the only issue remaining between licensing from IDCC was a FRAND rate. Anyway they got shot down and the ITC is retaining the case. I could not get the document to print but it is a definite must read, especially, where Nokia says the only issue to licensing was the FRAND rate. The following document was showed up today for viewing and was the Order of the ALJ on May 31, 2012. (Go IDCC. I think Nokia knows they are in a pickle this time). Not if Nokia licenses but when.


483273
Quick-View

Details (1 File) Order 29 337-800 Violation Public 06/19/2012 05:08 PM David P. Shaw USITC Administrative Law Judge
Inv Title: Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and Components Thereof; 337-TA-800
Doc TitleVery Happyenying Nokia's Motion to Terminate the Investigation


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next