Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
Replies to Msg. #726803
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
45558 Re: Nokia lost on their motion to terminate the investigation against
   Although Nokia did say that the only barrier to licensing was the FRAN... 		drwein72   IDCC   20 Jun 2012
 11:25 PM
45557 Re: Nokia lost on their motion // PDF document
   Here's the document. Looks like a redacted version of the original fro... 		postyle   IDCC   20 Jun 2012
 10:41 PM
45556 Re: Nokia lost on their motion to terminate the investigation against
   what's the deal... why is IDCC always wanting to be so secretive? appa... 		bim24   IDCC   20 Jun 2012
 10:37 PM
45555 Re: Nokia lost on their motion to terminate the investigation against
   So LG, Huawei and Nokia, again, have admited that they owe InterDigita... 		Rakitno   IDCC   20 Jun 2012
 10:10 PM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Nokia lost on their motion to terminate the investigation against

By: my3sons87 in IDCC
Wed, 20 Jun 12 10:04 PM
Msg. 45554 of 48237
Jump to msg. #  

them. And in the filing they state the only issue remaining between licensing from IDCC was a FRAND rate. Anyway they got shot down and the ITC is retaining the case. I could not get the document to print but it is a definite must read, especially, where Nokia says the only issue to licensing was the FRAND rate. The following document was showed up today for viewing and was the Order of the ALJ on May 31, 2012. (Go IDCC. I think Nokia knows they are in a pickle this time). Not if Nokia licenses but when.


483273
Quick-View

Details (1 File) Order 29 337-800 Violation Public 06/19/2012 05:08 PM David P. Shaw USITC Administrative Law Judge
Inv Title: Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and Components Thereof; 337-TA-800
Doc TitleVery Happyenying Nokia's Motion to Terminate the Investigation