Loop,
For some reason I get the feeling this is a trick question.... But I'll bite. 
I don't know Intel's entire product line and I don't follow them that closely. All I know is that they are predominantly a chipmaker and IDCC has not been licensing their wireless protocol patents at the chip level to date. I haven't seen any terminal units made by Intel yet, and I haven't read any plans for them to get into that. I know it gets complicated when we start dealing with designers, contractors, carve outs for co-branded or collaborative efforts... but I don't think INTC is at that stage with any type of product.
In the past, when Intel wants to announce a new platform, they have partnered with manufacturers to make the prototypes and products. This is what they did with their Ultrabooks initiative recently.
And I think there is a distinction we must all make between a company using IDCC's IPR and a company being expected to take a license with IDCC.
I don't expect Intel to license with IDCC any more than I expect QCOM to license with IDCC, and I'm positive QCOM uses IDCC's patents in some of their products. (Although I don't think those products are significant in quantity.)
As for INTC's chips... I don't know how advanced they have become and if anything new by them will (now or in the future) breach a barrier in regards to needing IDCC's air interface patents... but if so, it would be news to me.
| 
