« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Intel vs ARM**

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 14 Jun 12 9:47 PM | 96 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 08453 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 08452 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

My fear -

Intel will create a kind of incumbency in the PC space using Deepsafe. And by the time ARM products arrive, it is already an Intel-controlled fiefdom.

In this regard, AMD's adoption of TZ is important. It pushes TZ into the PC space fairly quickly. And so it makes Intel's empire building harder.

Does Wave have any kind of relationship with Intel re Deepsafe?




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Intel vs ARM***
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Thu, 14 Jun 12 9:19 PM
Msg. 08452 of 54959

Hi 4321,

I was thinking about these sorts of traditional variables.

But security is another important variable going forwards.

I think awk has an interesting argument.

What I was trying to get across was about the ecosystem thing. It seems this is what ARM identifies as its distinguishing feature. awk seems to be saying the same thing will apply with execution sandboxes.

I see the market as reshaping around the internet model which demands cooperation rather than monopolisation. I was thinking the ecosystem discussion and my cooperation argument are much the same thing.

Beyond the proprietorial argument, I am curious which features you have identified which make ARM's TZ superior to Intel's Deepsafe. I have been looking on Google for side by side comparisons of features, but haven't had much luck.

Is the difference mainly about providing a common domain for TCG-enabled trustlets, versus an Intel-controlled one?


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next