« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Some more interesting ITC filings: 

By: magillagorilla in IDCC | Recommend this post (2)
Wed, 13 Jun 12 1:22 AM | 374 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 45444 of 48237
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

482706
Quick-View
Details (1 File) Order 33 337-800 Violation Confidential 06/12/2012 01:51 PM David P. Shaw USITC Administrative Law Judge
Inv Title: Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and Components Thereof; 337-TA-800
Doc Title:

Granting Motions Seeking Recommendations for Letters of Request 
(This should heat things up)


482645
Quick-View
Details (1 File) Motion 337-800 Violation Confidential 06/11/2012 05:13 PM Jamie D. Underwood Alston & Bird LLP Nokia Corporation and Nokia Inc.
Inv Title: Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and Components Thereof; 337-TA-800
Doc Title: Nokia Corporation's Request to Certify Order No. 29 for Interlocutory Review


482641
Quick-View
Details (2 Files) Motion 337-800 Violation Public 06/11/2012 05:11 PM Alan J. Heinrich Irell & Manella LLP Research In Motion
Inv Title: Certain Wireless Devices with 3G Capabilities and Components Thereof; 337-TA-800
Doc Title: Non-Party Research in Motion Corporation's Unopposed Motion for Extension of Time to Respond (See below)

UNITED STATES INTERNATIONAL TRADE COMMISSION
WASHINGTON, D.C.
Before The Honorable David P. Shaw
Administrative Law Judge
In the Matter of
CERTAIN WIRELESS DEVICES WITH
3G CAPABILITIES AND
COMPONENTS THEREOF
Investigation No. 337-TA-800
NON-PARTY RESEARCH IN MOTION CORPORATION'S UNOPPOSED MOTION
FOR EXTENSION OF TIME TO RESPOND

Non-party Research In Motion Corporation ("RIM"), by its attorneys and by agreement
of the parties and the Office of Unfair Import Investigations (“OUII”), moves this tribunal for an
extension of the date on which RIM must answer or otherwise respond to the Subpoena Duces
Tecum And Ad Testificandum issued by the United States International Trade Commission upon
an application made by Respondent Huawei in the above-entitled investigation ("Subpoena"), to and including June 21, 2012. In support of its motion, RIM states as follows:

1. The Subpoena requires RIM to take certain action, including filing any motion
concerning the Subpoena, within 10 days after receipt of the Subpoena, namely by June 11,
2012.
2. RIM requests an extension of time until June 21, 2012 to answer or otherwise
respond to the Subpoena, including filing a motion concerning the Subpoena.
3. RIM seeks this extension in order to conduct its internal investigation and, if
appropriate, negotiate with Respondents regarding the scope of the Subpoena, potentially
avoiding the need for contested motion practice.
4. Counsel for Huawei, on behalf of Respondents, as well as counsel for
Complainant InterDigital, Inc. and the OUII do not object to the extension sought by this Motion.
2658722.1 02 - 2 –

WHEREFORE, RIM respectfully requests that this Tribunal grant its Motion for
extension of time to and including June 21, 2012, to respond to the Subpoena.
Dated: June 11, 2012 IRELL & MANELLA




» You can also:
« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next