ASM- KOP- FINAL
FIVE OR SIX OF US ONE ON ONE WITH BM AFTER THE MEETING
MANY ANSWERS WERE PROVIDED BY OTHER POSTERS- WILLPOST ONLY WHAT I THINK WAS NOT MENTIONED
LG ARBITRATION- JUDGE NEVER READ THE COMPLAINT- SAW AN ARBITRATION CLAUSE AND GRANTED IT- WE WILL APPEAL
FTC PONTIFICATING ABOUT BANS BEING ANTICOMPETIVE- THEY HAVE NO DIRECT AUTHORITY, ONLY EXPRESS AN OPINION
ITC HAS THE FINAL SAY
CAN THE ITC POSTPONE THE HEARING IN NOVEMBER? VERY UNLIKLY. JUDGES AT THE FTC CAN DO ANY THING THEY WANT.
THE ITC IS STATUTORILY CONSTRAINED AND MUST ABIDE BY A TIME SCHEDULE.
AND MOST IMPORTANTLY:
THE LG ARB, THE FTC AGAINST BANS, THE HUEIWI? SUIT IN EUROPE AND OTHER LEGAL MANUEVERS IS ALL NOISE.
WE HAVE OUR EYE ON THE BALL AND THAT IS THE ITC HEARING IN NOV. THE ITC HAS A NEW STAFF AND A NEW JUDGE.
WE HAVE A ROBUST PEDIGREE PATENT PACKAGE IN FRONT OF THEM. IT WILL TAKE ONLY ONE STAFF MEMBER TO AGREE
WITH US ON ONE PATENT TO ESTABLISH A TIPPING POINT CREATING TREMENDOUS PRESSURE TO COME TO THE TABLE.
THE END
| 