« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: rak.  

By: magillagorilla in IDCC | Recommend this post (2)
Fri, 08 Jun 12 6:15 AM | 387 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 45395 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 45388 by teecee)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

LG PLA- Form 10-Q - EXHIBIT 10.82
Quarterly Report
Filed May 10, 2006
http://ir.interdigital.com/secfiling.cfm?filingID=1193125-06-107083


according to Bm today...LG has never ever brought up arbitration in their negotiations w/ idc....and really have no desire to do so...when you fight a case...you use every possible defense...when you file your response...he said the whole arb thing is BS..and it really wont effect the outcome...he also said the contract is available for public viewing...and that we should read it ourselves as evidence of the finality of the contract..




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
rak.
By: teecee
in IDCC
Fri, 08 Jun 12 1:06 AM
Msg. 45388 of 48237

according to Bm today...LG has never ever brought up arbitration in their negotiations w/ idc....and really have no desire to do so...when you fight a case...you use every possible defense...when you file your response...he said the whole arb thing is BS..and it really wont effect the outcome...he also said the contract is available for public viewing...and that we should read it ourselves as evidence of the finality of the contract...also i asked him if the apppl contract could be a detriment if forced to arb...he said the initial rate was actually very healthy the way the contract was written...and we know the rest


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next