apparently, the arb clause surviving is not uncommon.. but i still don't know what they are arbitrating? the rate? but they are not paying anything right now and for almost years. it is one thing for them to pay something currently under a contract and their is a dispute (like the tech solutions and other arbs which my be disputing whether tablets are covered)...
and how come nok tried the same tactic and got tossed?
i think this ITC judge is going down a rathole that may be setting the wrong precedence.
very confusing.
| 