« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Big Miss 69

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 01 Jun 12 6:59 PM | 73 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 08228 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 08226 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Inflation is a means to devalue or unwind debt. Coupled with resisting new debt, at some level banks end up holding the bag. Deflation makes debt unbearable, essentially requiring the catharsis of catastrophic debt liquidation. It is important ro realize that staunch protection of currency protects the debtor more than the indebted. It seems doma's interpretation of money supply as only a vehicle to protect banks overlooks the consequential erosion of the real-value of their assets.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Big Miss 69
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Fri, 01 Jun 12 6:39 PM
Msg. 08226 of 54959

Hi doma,

I think that by supporting their currencies, central banks think they are stabilising one portion of the economy upon which people depend.

Sometimes support means reducing high inflation (the waning value of money). Sometimes it means diluting the value of money (when deflation makes both consumption and investment unappealing).

We are facing the latter, and QE is the banks' principal remedy at the moment.

The cost is borne by savers, that is true. Indeed, it is the point. The aim is to get people buying and investing again. A currency that harms an economy is not a desirable phenomenon, either way. Sometimes, it is the case that collective thriftiness is harmful to society. Paradoxical, I know.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next