« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Bipartisan Congressional Bill Would Authorize the Use of Propaganda On Americans Living Inside America

By: ribit in ROUND | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 22 May 12 10:23 PM | 38 view(s)
Boardmark this board | De's Test Board
Msg. 41330 of 45651
(This msg. is a reply to 41309 by capt_nemo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

captain
Bipartisan Congressional Bill Would Authorize the Use of Propaganda On Americans Living Inside America

...they been doin it for years anyhow. Those of us who can see thru the bullshit aren't impressed.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Bipartisan Congressional Bill Would Authorize the Use of Propaganda On Americans Living Inside America
By: capt_nemo
in ROUND
Tue, 22 May 12 3:45 AM
Msg. 41309 of 45651

Because Banning Propaganda “Ties the Hands of America’s Diplomatic Officials, Military, and Others by Inhibiting Our Ability to Effectively Communicate In a Credible Way”

Michael Hastings reports:

An amendment that would legalize the use of propaganda on American audiences is being inserted into the latest defense authorization bill....

The amendment would “strike the current ban on domestic dissemination” of propaganda material produced by the State Department and the Pentagon, according to the summary of the law at the House Rules Committee's official website.

The tweak to the bill would essentially neutralize two previous acts—the Smith-Mundt Act of 1948 and Foreign Relations Authorization Act in 1987—that had been passed to protect U.S. audiences from our own government’s misinformation campaigns.

The bi-partisan amendment is sponsored by Rep. Mac Thornberry from Texas and Rep. Adam Smith from Washington State.

In a little noticed press release earlier in the week — buried beneath the other high-profile issues in the $642 billion defense bill, including indefinite detention and a prohibition on gay marriage at military installations — Thornberry warned that in the Internet age, the current law “ties the hands of America’s diplomatic officials, military, and others by inhibiting our ability to effectively communicate in a credible way.”

The bill's supporters say the informational material used overseas to influence foreign audiences is too good to not use at home, and that new techniques are needed to help fight Al-Qaeda, a borderless enemy whose own propaganda reaches Americans online.

Critics of the bill say there are ways to keep America safe without turning the massive information operations apparatus within the federal government against American citizens.

***

“I just don’t want to see something this significant – whatever the pros and cons – go through without anyone noticing,” “ says one source on the Hill, who is disturbed by the law. According to this source, the law would allow "U.S. propaganda intended to influence foreign audiences to be used on the domestic population."

The new law would give sweeping powers to the State Department and Pentagon to push television, radio, newspaper, and social media onto the U.S. public. “It removes the protection for Americans,” says a Pentagon official who is concerned about the law. “It removes oversight from the people who

http://www.zerohedge.com/contributed/2012-21-21/bipartisan-congressional-bill-would-authorize-use-propaganda-americans-living


« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next