« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Gambling Bankers 

By: Zimbler0 in POPE | Recommend this post (2)
Sun, 20 May 12 6:22 AM | 52 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 58619 of 65535
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

(From a Motley Fool article.)

It wasn't always this way. From the 1930s through the late 1990s, commercial banks were legally separated from the investment banking arms that engage in speculative trading. But that's no longer the case. Well-intentioned FDIC insurance designed for bland and vital commercial banking is now intermingled with reliably explosive gambling. A sensible patch for this regulatory flaw dubbed the "Volcker rule" has been watered down into irrelevancy, so the traders' heads-I-win-tails-taxpayers-lose system still exists. That's one reason why JPMorgan's recent losses are such a big deal.

http://www.fool.com/investing/general/2012/05/14/banking-same-as-it-ever-was-.aspx


CrossPosted by Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.




» You can also:
« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next