Okay doma,
But surely you think thoughts that don't result with one of: it's a universal conspiracy of European bankers; it's a hologram; buy gold; we are all slaves of astronaut gods.
For me, it is all about a matrix of opposing forces. But that doesn't mean I am unable to talk about the US constitution as an insufficiently flexible document, without referring to my template.
I believe you can think about the constitution's terms without bothering with demanding we must see it as part of a global conspiracy. How about thinking about the document itself, rather than the dark forces you think control it. Given your insights, and in an ideal world, what features of the US constitution do you think are sensible and which would you change?
For me, it sets the speed limit of change too low.
| 
