« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Time breastfeeding cover sparks controversy 

By: oldCADuser in FFFT | Recommend this post (2)
Wed, 16 May 12 8:31 PM | 54 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 42040 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 41778 by Riana)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Uploaded Image




Avatar

OCU




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Time breastfeeding cover sparks controversy
By: Riana
in FFFT
Fri, 11 May 12 7:19 AM
Msg. 41778 of 65535

Americans are prudes when it comes to breasts. You can definitely see our Puritan roots. Embarassed

I wonder if anyone has done any research on the health benefits of breast-feeding beyond one year (which is what most pediatricians recommend). I wonder what physical and/or psychological benefits mother and child gain from extended breast feeding.

I don't particularly have a problem with discreet breast-feeding in public - babies have to eat, too, after all - but I'm not sure you could discreetly breast-feed a three-year-old. I always figured that once a child can actually say "Mommy, give me milk," the milk should probably come from a sippy cup, not a breast. But that's my opinion. 

This week's Time magazine cover features Jamie Lynne Grumet, a 26-year-old woman breastfeeding her three-year-old son. Grumet was one of four mothers photographed by Time for a cover story on "attachment parenting," an approach--outlined by 1992's "The Baby Book" by Dr. Bill Sears--that recommends extended breast-feeding, co-sleeping and "baby wearing." Time's cover line for the May 21 issue asks, "Are You Mom Enough?"

http://news.yahoo.com/blogs/cutline/time-breastfeeding-cover-sparks-immediate-controversy-151539970.html


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next