« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Entomology clarification***

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 08 May 12 7:03 PM | 37 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 07734 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 07733 by DigSpace)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Then the next question is, do you dare apply the same thought to the whole universe?

Do I dare and do I dare, as Mr Prufrock would say?

At one extreme, is the uncertainty principle not an assertion that is a little similar?

And at the other, why is the universe's expansion continuing to accelerate, unless perhaps there is some additional expansive force to oppose gravity?

For me, in the beginning (as it were) there must at a minimum have existed some force which bound things together and another which, when released, produced the forces of expansion. Big Bang when the tension exploded.

Dualism as a minimum.

Pure principles are against nature. They even say that a black hole releases a little bit of information.


I believe this dynamic but forceful opposition is the essential nature of everything.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Entomology clarification***
By: DigSpace
in ALEA
Tue, 08 May 12 6:51 PM
Msg. 07733 of 54959

yes, my appropriately noticed willingness to partisanly discount some but not others as pointed out by wavedog:

""I think it a reach to describe them or asssign them as scientists" Same could be said as to describing inquisitors as christians."

coupled with awks brief but clear:

"Hence...

People who are dangerous do not allow that principles be modified..."

somehow managed to cut to the heart of the matter for me.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next