« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Entomology clarification

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 08 May 12 3:45 AM | 31 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 07703 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 07699 by DigSpace)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I thought they had decided Neanderthal still walks and it is us. Or a little part of some of us.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Entomology clarification
By: DigSpace
in ALEA
Tue, 08 May 12 3:04 AM
Msg. 07699 of 54959

Ahh, Hobbit man, so you follow this somewhat.

There are some things for anybody that looks at this stuff that are some fun, the whole Neanderthal genome project (Noonan? and I cant remember the competing principle group and a subsequent reconciliation of data discrepancies by yet a third). Neanderthal DNA is old and broken, Neanderthal even if one wanted to will likely not walk again. The Mammoth?, expect it. The Woolly Mammoth will walk again. I just don't know what I think of that. The notion of Woolly Mammoths walking again is frankly weird, but that there would even be an outside chance that some folks could conjur Neanderthal, tell me that would not challenge everything from Genesis to the Dali Llama, and, for sure, revisit the question of just because we can, should we? We always do when we can, so perhaps that is the answer. In all of my self centered (Homo centered) rationalizations, it just seems a little rough to bring back the fuzzy behemoth, even if we can surround it with suitable habitat.

Evolution has always given one thing, at some point fixed alleles when the pressure is either off or was too great.

Going all Dolly on Manfred would be positively time-line jarring.

(I have no data on shoe size)


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next