« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Follow-up ? on Families (Data) ...

By: Rakitno in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 04 May 12 10:22 PM | 308 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 45094 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 45093 by Data_Rox)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

So, all patents sold are actually, at minimum, "patent families"? Because why would anyone buy an individual issued patent without it's corresponding international equivalent, at minimum.

Also, when counting the number of patents issued to InterDigital should an international equivalent patent be considered a single seperate patent in one's tally?


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: rak Re: New $100 Million Stock Repurchase Authorization! (Data)
By: Data_Rox
in IDCC
Fri, 04 May 12 10:10 PM
Msg. 45093 of 48237

good question

jmo.....in the case of IDCC

most should look at the USPTO issued patent as the underlying patent for an invention (where they usually file first). That patent.....and it's specific international equivalent(s)...could be considered your immediate "family". When you add in US patent continuations/continuations in part (and their international equivalents) to the initial priority (initial invention)...you have...let's call it an extended family.

A "portfolio"..... would typically be a group of patents or patent families (continuations, continuations in part, and their associated international equivalents) that are grouped together around a particular technology or solution....not so much just a particular "invention"

jmo


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next