Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
Replies to Msg. #708862
.
 Msg. #  Subject Posted by    Board    Date   
07467 Re: Exactly tkc*
   That second paragraph mirrors much of my own attitude for the last six... 		Down And Out Man   ALEA   27 Apr 2012
 6:01 PM
07466 Re: Exactly tkc*
   To justify the investment of outside investors in Wave, I would estima... 		Cactus Flower   ALEA   27 Apr 2012
 6:01 PM
07465 Re: Exactly tkc*
   Disregard it CF. "Not sure I understand the $1.6bn point." I misplaced... 		tkc   ALEA   27 Apr 2012
 5:57 PM

The above list shows replies to the following message:

Re: Exactly tkc*

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA
Fri, 27 Apr 12 5:40 PM
Msg. 07464 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 07462 by tkc)
Jump to msg. #  

Not sure I understand the $1.6bn point. But yes, numberswise I am reminded not to rely on anything Wave says. The only numbers worth contemplating are the ones which are audited or that give rise to a legal obligation. This is a ridiculous state of affairs in a public company.

My mistake for paying attention to the CC. I feel the same sense of revulsion I used to feel when I listened to CCs around the time that TPMs were introduced and SKS was carroting to his heart's content. Oddly enough, I dislike being mislead and manipulated.