Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

edit Re: optimism**

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 13 Apr 12 9:58 PM | 127 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix 		Msg. 07351 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 07347 by Cactus Flower)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

yes but in that it seems its VISA that excludes mnos, VISa becomes the trustlet owner, but the same my-business/your business barrier would seem to apply. Their is the notion that the trustlet must get into/out of the TZ for each and every run, but I'm inclined to think VISa or the mil or anybody else will consider such information, information that the event even occurred to be proprietary and not enforceable at a per event level.

edit: more clearly, loading the device with the trustlet bears a fee, the actual running of the app (migration of the app to TZ), an entirely untethered intradevice event, bears no fee. The frequency or even the occurance of such an event being proprietary to the trustlet author/owner.


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: optimism**
By: Cactus Flower in ALEA
Fri, 13 Apr 12 9:30 PM 		Msg. 07347 of 54959

hi dig,

that's the question i am wondering about. but let's not forget trustlet distribution.

as awk keeps reminding everyone, the finread work pops back into the mix via arm.

if an active trustzone finds its way into the marketplace somehow, i am not sure the mnos can stop it being used for transactional purposes. their defense relies on exclusion of these kinds of capabilities from handsets available in the market. if enterprise breaks the dam, anything might happen.

i think enterprise authentication is a trojan horse.

« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next