« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

editRe: optimism

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 13 Apr 12 9:55 PM | 89 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 07350 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 07348 by DigSpace)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

I mean, lets say mil wants a high value applet on its combat phones. Some little thingy that affords using the camera as a range finder, the GPS as a location identifier, and affords with the entering of an appropriate authority code the launching of a missile from a drone in a parking flight position. Mil is going to require all of that capability to be completely locked down. The app itself must be encrypted and only afforded transient decryption for execution in TZ. It would seem that the loading of the trustlet and tying the trustlet to a specific device would incur a fee, a one time fee. Management of the device would entail a recurring fee. Updating the trustlet would incur a new fee. It seems to me though that there would be no time-dependent component to the trustlet, it is really nobody's business if mil uses, is using, continues to use, will use, has ever used the trustlet. It seems to me the same my-business/your-business barrier would apply to any truslet for any enterprise. One fee to install one trustlet, after that it and the device are owned. Device maintenance is a separate issue.

edit: the actual running of the app, and entirely untethered intradevice event, bears no fee.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: optimism
By: DigSpace
in ALEA
Fri, 13 Apr 12 9:42 PM
Msg. 07348 of 54959

I'm viewing payment as an example of a trustlet. In the first example it would cohabitate the TZ space and hence the notion of rental space. In the second SIM-dependent example it would be untethered from the core trustlet environment (TZ). In either case the strength and leverage of Wave IP to command for example trustlet verification/installation/swapping fees (notably the swapping patent e.g.) remains to be demonstrated. That they have had a run at the TAN and swapping and lay protected IP claims in this area is certainly interesting, but the opportunity there rapidly migrates to hand-raising/who-knows land for me.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next