I don't agree that you resolve the problem by that means. You just end up with another choice provided by the company, and we will remain in the dark about governance issues.
What we need is light. Someone from the board should be made available to answer the damn questions. Someone who isn't the CEO or the CFO.
There are legitimate governance questions here. And the board simply seems to have no connection with shareholders. For the most part, they don't own shares so of course their interests are not entirely aligned with ours. Where's their downside risk?