« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Wave's US Army news*

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 27 Mar 12 7:59 PM | 50 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 07072 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 07071 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

alea, I'm smushing it together with the Sole source thing, but the two in their language are not entirely reconcilable. One states essentially pre-deployment work for a specific roll-out (FBCB2) with a specific hardware provider (DRS) with a specific anticipated time frame (Feb/Mar). That read as a pure SED play. That posting seems to be in the latter of your two scenarios, that the produc tis chosen.

This latest PR (which may be the same) smacks more of a active TPM adventure speculatively involving WEM. That would require work if all that legacy BIOS issue is in play.

The mobile client and the host systems presumably have to be on the same page if they are to share meaningfully, both host and client integrity must be monitored in which case unless one dumps everything, some legacy remediation is in order.

It would seem to me if FBCBC2 was it, the wording would be a little different and this sounds a little more structural.

Final opinion, the broader work-up to create an open field would IMO involve more than modest payment, on the order of historical efforts of this kind that were in the 800k-1.8m range. The closer it is linked to a deployment, the less Wave gets paid IMO. There wasn't a specific service item for BP e.g. (although I spose one should wait for the 10k on that and guess) but the apparent price per seat to BP (?$95?) seems to reflect the possibility that Wave largely ate the pre-deployment engineering/services.

That's how I am choosing to interpret this, is is 'for Wave products' work and as such, Wave doesn't get paid much at all. Wave sells software, not engineering, if their software requires engineering, that's Wave's problem. Gov will eat some of the pure expenses, but not a dime more than that.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Wave's US Army news*
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Tue, 27 Mar 12 7:08 PM
Msg. 07071 of 54959

looks like another strategic step.

Important. Foot in the door and all that.

Actually, let me be less flippant. I think this release probably implies (1) the army is going to switch on its TPMs. And TPMs are the thing which differentiates Wave from its competitors most clearly.

But it also suggests the need for more time.

Engineering work .... then adoption.

So the first question is the same one we keep asking. How long (2)?

There's a second question as well.

The money isn't in the engineering. It's in the purchase of services. The revenue isn't material (modest), so let's approximate to zero and forget about that.

So that's not the second question.

The second question (curiously 3) is about the kind of engineering work Wave is being asked to do. Is Wave preparing the ground for itself or for a TCG structure which permits participation by everyone?

One might hope the former. But the Army may require the latter.

Those are the three things which jumped out, on top of the fact that this is certainly net positive news.

------------------------------

U.S. Army Awards Wave a Contract for the Design of Encryption Management for Vehicle-Based Mobile Computers

LEE, MA--(Marketwire - March 27, 2012) - Wave Systems Corp. (NASDAQ: WAVX) announced today that it has received a contract from the U.S. Army. Under the terms of the contract, Wave will provide labor, equipment and management to implement solutions for the Army's self-encrypting drives (SEDs) in support of Army operations.

The Army is exploring the enablement of SEDs with Trusted Platform Modules (TPMs) in its systems in order to mitigate the possibility of data being compromised if hardware were to fall into enemy hands. Wave has been retained to provide expertise in the area of SEDs and TPMs to help yield the maximum security advantage of these technologies while minimizing the disruptive impact to Army's fielding and sustainment. Wave will also provide vital engineering support to Army missions in support of continental U.S. and overseas operations.

"This contract affirms the value and leadership that Wave brings in leveraging embedded security for mobile endpoints operating beyond the network perimeter," said Steven Sprague, CEO for Wave. "We're delighted to have the opportunity to help ensure that mission-critical data and communications remains under the secure control of central command at all times."

Trusted computing standards provide capabilities that can be leveraged in many mission systems where device assurance and integrity and data protection are required. As the adoption of trusted computing continues to grow across all platforms, there are many ways this industry-standard technology can be leveraged to reduce costs and improve security and assurance of any computing system. Wave provides the expertise and solutions to realize the security benefits of the industry standards.

While Wave's fees under this contract will be modest, the company views this as an important application of trusted computing solutions by the Army.

About Wave Systems
Wave Systems Corp. (NASDAQ: WAVX) reduces the complexity, cost and uncertainty of data protection by starting inside the device. Unlike other vendors who try to secure information by adding layers of software for security, Wave leverages the security capabilities built directly into endpoint computing platforms themselves. Wave has been a foremost expert on this growing trend, leading the way with first-to-market solutions and helping shape standards through its work as a board member for the Trusted Computing Group.

Safe Harbor for Forward-Looking Statements
This press release may contain forward-looking information within the meaning of the Private Securities Litigation Reform Act of 1995 and Section 21E of the Securities Exchange Act of 1934, as amended (the Exchange Act), including all statements that are not statements of historical fact regarding the intent, belief or current expectations of the company, its directors or its officers with respect to, among other things: (i) the company's financing plans; (ii) trends affecting the company's financial condition or results of operations; (iii) the company's growth strategy and operating strategy; and (iv) the declaration and payment of dividends. The words "may," "would," "will," "expect," "estimate," "anticipate," "believe," "intend" and similar expressions and variations thereof are intended to identify forward-looking statements. Investors are cautioned that any such forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future performance and involve risks and uncertainties, many of which are beyond the company's ability to control, and that actual results may differ materially from those projected in the forward-looking statements as a result of various factors. Wave assumes no duty to and does not undertake to update forward-looking statements.

All brands are the property of their respective owners.

Company:
Wave Systems Corp.
Michael Wheeler
413-243-7026
mwheeler@wave.com

Investor Relations:
David Collins, Jennifer Neuman
Jaffoni & Collins
212-835-8500
wavx@jcir.com


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next