« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: New theory

By: DigSpace in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 23 Mar 12 8:06 PM | 58 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 07010 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 07005 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

2 things,

1. isn't cash in the bank cash in the bank? I mean what is called RD vs what is called SGA or COS seems couldbe a little blurry, but a cash balance is rather empirical is it not

2. when you do cash on hand guestimation, basically starting with cash last Q, then wacking it with loss, then putting back non-cash items ... I'm troubled by the first step, subtracting the loss (or adding the gain) as that is an accounting number not a cash number. It does not discriminate between say booked previously deferred revs and instabook revs, some of their revs are cash, some of them are not.

That is why I take previous Q cash, add revs after adjusting the revs (backing out GM, BASF defrevs e.g.) taking the remaining revs as billings and adding any known large acct (BP).

I don't see how step one, using the GAAP-GL (a cash/non-cash composite) cannot be very fraught with error. Just as Wave punished its GL back in Q1 by deferring, they are now booking revs that have no money behind them (smoothing the holes, but from a CF perspective, a hole).

So what am I missing?


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
New theory
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Fri, 23 Mar 12 5:37 AM
Msg. 07005 of 54959

I don't think Wave's reasons for deferring their report seem quite substantial enough to explain it. That's my sense.

I have another thought. Just a speculation.

The auditor has told Wave they need to show they have, say, an extra $7m in the bank in order to have the going concern qualification removed. GC is forward-looking, so knowing the money is there would help persuade the auditor they are not exposed.

Why this year? Removing the GC qualification would be helpful if Wave is trying to secure government business, I'd think.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next