« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Gold standard, or not

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 22 Mar 12 8:52 PM | 96 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 06999 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 06998 by faul)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

hi doma,

the money in circulation needs to hold its value during the holding period. stability has value.

the market expressed its confidence in US paper when S&P downgraded the US credit rating. the flight to quality went straight into US treasuries. that tells you something important.

the money (plus the interest which accrues) in savings needs to be worth holding in a bank account in order to keep you holding it there. hence the interest element of the equation.

bear in mind that there's also a paradox in thriftiness. in fact, the economy as a whole generally does better when people use their money to consume and invest.

so the fed doesn't seek to make saving more appealing than these other options.

you've probably noticed that treasury rates usually run a little above inflation.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Gold standard, or not
By: faul
in ALEA
Thu, 22 Mar 12 8:42 PM
Msg. 06998 of 54959

Hi Alea.....


No.......All money no matter what form it's in,has to act as a store
of value.....otherwise what's the point of holding it??

I understand what historical record shows as opposed to what
some transient lip quivering chairman tells me.......Smile

Doma.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next