« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Mysterious $500k income mentioned in Q3 CC*

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 19 Mar 12 10:24 PM | 45 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 06925 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 06923 by DigSpace)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Hi dig,

Don't confuse tax style depreciation and income statement style depreciation.

The tax type version affects the tax liability.

On the income statement side of things, depreciation of fixed assets is a pure accounting calculation to reflect the diminution in the value of fixed assets over time.

You buy a car. Every year, its value diminishes but you don't pay anyone anything because it does so. What you paid for your car is in the purchase price.

So Wave purchased its fixed assets. And it is recognising that the value of those assets has diminished over time.

No effect on cash flow. So you have to pull it out of the cash flow calculation.

And of course, because Wave makes losses, the depreciation of the assets is a gathering tax asset, but this asset will not appear on the balance sheet.


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Mysterious $500k income mentioned in Q3 CC*
By: DigSpace
in ALEA
Mon, 19 Mar 12 10:13 PM
Msg. 06923 of 54959

yea, the SBcomp thingy was easy enough to understand, and as cash from 'financing activities' gets a line, that was simply enough. I just got thick brained on old paint.

I depreciate property on taxes, and the gov takes less from me because of it, but it seems weird, cause when I do go ahead and paint, I expense that too. From an operational standpoint, I get to expense it twice?

Needless to say, I don't do my own books.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next