« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Ha ha ha

By: 4321 in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Sat, 17 Mar 12 6:29 PM | 67 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 06888 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 06887 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

alea,

Is this what you are referring to? Does this explain why we don't see Wave Employees buying on the open market because they are awarded stock and that becomes a cost to Wave? Pay in lieu of a bigger salary?

"an increase in non-Safend stock based compensation of approximately $2.6 million as a result of increased estimated fair values for the 2011 stock-based payment awards,"


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Ha ha ha
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Sat, 17 Mar 12 5:51 PM
Msg. 06887 of 54959

Has no one else noticed stock-based compensation costs? I guess I've been too lazy to read these documents thoroughly.

That's a sort of dilution which is counted as a cost in the P&L by accounting convention; but it ain't cashflow as far as Wave's treasury is concerned.

Now I understand Feeney's cash management a whole lot better. And I should have been paying attention to the non-GAAP reporting in the quarterly report.

That's so funny. I spent all this time and never noticed a critical number. Was wondering what Yahoo's adjustments to net income number is in the cash flow. Now I know.

So Wave's losses partly result from R&D and partly from issuance of stock to staff. That's a far more benign scenario than I'd been thinking about up to now.

Wonder if dig's doughnut is whole after all.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next