« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Erections Get Insurance; Why Not the Pill? 

By: Beldin in POPE | Recommend this post (2)
Tue, 13 Mar 12 8:26 PM | 60 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 53437 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 53379 by DigSpace)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

"FWIW the testimony from the slut was concerning Endometriosis..."

BS ... her example of the lesbian with endometriosis was just an aside to help bolster her main point that she shouldn't have to pay for her own birth control. Personally, I see absolutely nothing wrong with including coverage for contraceptives, whether for medical conditions such as endometriosis or for general birth control, but the insureds should be willing to pay the increased premiums for such coverage and employers should retain their right to opt out of such coverage if they have religious objection to birth control.

"Its not the gov telling the insurance companies what to do, its the people, the government is the peoples agent."

BS ... one leftist, "women's rights" activist whining at a Nancy Pelosi dog-and-pony-show is not the people. This is nothing more than a request for a nanny government to enter into private contracts where it constitutionally does not belong and attempt to squash the First Amendment rights of some American citizens at the behest of others.

Again, Fluke lied through her teeth ... $1,000 per year for birth control is a ridiculous number. It's already been proven that the actual amount is only about 10% of that ludicrous figure. And, in any event, it isn't a university's responsibility to provide for its students' birth control ... the students should be personally responsible enough to go to Starbuck's one fewer times a month and use the savings to pay for their own birth control.




Avatar

The essential American soul is hard, isolate, stoic, and a killer. It has never yet melted. ~ D.H. Lawrence


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Erections Get Insurance; Why Not the Pill?
By: DigSpace
in POPE
Tue, 13 Mar 12 5:44 AM
Msg. 53379 of 65535

FWIW the testimony from the slut was concerning Endometriosis, and having your innards sticking together is not "normal function", is extremely painful, folks have done all sorts of surgery for it, and the front line treatment today is the pill. I know a 15 year old right wing evangelical young lady on birth control for Endometriosis, and am less than fond of micro's and Rush's content describing her.

I know, insurance and employers should be able to cherry pick coverage, in on heart disease, out on diabetes, o.k. with skin cancer, but screw bone cancer ... and of course, workers should not be able to feely assemble and enter into enforceable contracts.

Porn stars use viagra not to restore function but to enhance it, is the argument that the insurance company should individually vet every application of every medicine for every individual?

Its not the gov telling the insurance companies what to do, its the people, the government is the peoples agent.


« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next