« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Topic: The Blunt-Rubio bill is a disaster for women

By: clo in POPE | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 12 Mar 12 4:37 PM | 37 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 53264 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 53262 by micro)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

micro, I'm posting this from a Conservative's site, MAYBE then you will be willing to digest it...
If Romney is your candidate, Obamacare becomes a mute point...

Further Proof Romney Supported a National Individual Mandate In 2009

Posted by Erick Erickson (Diary)

Saturday, March 3rd at 7:54PM EDT

As I mentioned yesterday, back in 2009 Mitt Romney took to the pages of USA Today to tell President Obama that as he came up with a healthcare plan he should consider using “tax penalties” as Massachusetts did or “tax credits, as others have proposed” to help cover the costs of health care.

The “tax penalties” is Mitt Romney’s individual mandate, a key portion the Obama Administration has credited all along as having been embraced in Obamacare.

Since pointing out yesterday that, in his own words, Mitt Romney supported a national individual mandate, his supporters have gone totally insane on twitter fully denying and trying to spin their way out of this story. Despite Romney’s own words in his editorial, Mitt Romney’s supporters are denying Romney’s own words.

But Romney did not just write an op-ed. He went on Meet the Press too. You can hear Mitt Romney on Meet the Press recommend the President take one of two approaches in formulating health care.

The first approach Romney suggests is Romneycare, which Mitt Romney now claims was never intended to be a model for the nation.

The second approach Romney suggests is the Wyden-Bennett health reform measure then pending in the United States Senate. Wyden-Bennett, like Romneycare, contained an individual mandate.

In other words, skipping the diplomatic phrasing of some, Mitt Romney lies each time he says he never supported a national individual mandate. 

http://www.redstate.com/erick/2012/03/03/further-proof-romney-supported-a-national-individual-mandate-in-2009/




Avatar

DO SOMETHING!




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Topic: The Blunt-Rubio bill is a disaster for women
By: micro
in POPE
Mon, 12 Mar 12 3:59 PM
Msg. 53262 of 65535

Nice try to deflect and doge.

Romneycare did not force people to TAKE health care and PAT A PENALTY if they did not want it like YOUR HERO the Socialist in Chief.

BIG DIFFERENCE CLO.

Also, you would be leading the crying party if those poor folks in Massachusetts who did not have any health care didn;t get any or have the option to get some, which Romney actually filled that bridge, but unlike OBAMMY, did not force it on the employers and everyone else along with PENALTIES like Obama.

You now not of what you speak my dear.


« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next