« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Topic: The Blunt-Rubio bill is a disaster for women 

By: Zimbler0 in POPE | Recommend this post (3)
Mon, 12 Mar 12 12:03 AM | 61 view(s)
Boardmark this board | (The) Pope's for real stock market report
Msg. 53248 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 53246 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

Clo> Why should insurance cover your high cholesterol meds or someone else's high blood pressure meds?

Because it is cheaper & more practical.
>>>


Cheaper for who, Clo?
Me? Or the other ratepayers paying for it?

I think what you just do not get . . .

In an open marketplace one can buy anything one wants.

If one wants an insurance policy that provides for
birth control - one can buy one.

If an employer wants to provide a drug perscription
benefit that's fine. No problem.

If an employer wants to provide contraception as
part of the benefits package that's fine too. As
you like to point out, it is cheaper to provide
contraception than it is to bring another baby into
the world.

What is NOT fine . . . is for one person to say
"YOU MUST pay for someone elses contraception".

Zim.




Avatar

Mad Poet Strikes Again.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Topic: The Blunt-Rubio bill is a disaster for women
By: clo
in POPE
Sun, 11 Mar 12 11:39 PM
Msg. 53246 of 65535

zimbler,

Why should insurance cover your high cholesterol meds or someone else's high blood pressure meds?

Because it is cheaper & more practical.

Its certainly cheaper to pay for birth control than for a full term pregnancy & delivery & after care for both mother & child.

Hey, but this hard line the republicans have taken will certainly cost you VOTES. ')

Lets Stay Together, Obama 2012!



« POPE Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next