Submitted by Tyler Durden on 03/02/2012 - 13:54 Australia Florida Iran Iraq Lehman Lehman Brothers national security Saudi Arabia Steven Rattner
While 9/11 was far more traumatic for many Americans than for myself, it really messed me up emotionally for a while. I thought about joining the armed forces or the newly created Department of Homeland Security. I almost quit my job to get a graduate degree in something I could do to help fight the “war on terror.” The city of my birth was attacked and two great symbols I had seen repeatedly growing up had suddenly vanished. I never once questioned anything about 9/11 for many, many years. I was emotionally reprogrammed. I now realize that was the intent and I am not happy about it. Look, I will be the first to say I have no idea what really happened on that day, but I can tell you one thing. I am 100% convinced that it wasn’t 19 cave dwelling Al Qaeda members who hate us for our “freedoms.” I can also tell you that two planes didn’t take down three buildings. The real reason I am writing this piece today is because of a very, very important article from the NY Times, parts of which I have quoted at the top. The article shows how two former Senators have said in sworn statements that they believe the government of Saudi Arabia was directly involved in the attacks. Now, such speculation is not new; however, let’s not forget the very close relationships that many of the elite in the U.S. have with the Saudi government. Furthermore, let’s analyze some of the passages in the article in a little more detail.
Comments: 420
Reads: 21,202
http://www.zerohedge.com/news/mike-krieger-asks-whether-september-11-2001-our-big-lie
TruthInSunshine
TruthInSunshine's picture
I am not an engineer or physicist, so some of the claims and counterclaims about what was and wasn't possible that day are admittedly over my comrehension, but not all the claims are.
One of the things I find oddest about the official story is more along the lines of something that doesn't mesh with my common sense (there is more than one thing, but this one thing is something I haven't found a rational answer to as of yet):
It's the passport of one of the alleged hijackers that was found relatively unscathed, on the streets around the towers, in the rubble.
How could it be that a document comprised of the materials that passports are comprised of not be severely damaged if not completely destroyed as a result of being inside of a commercial airliner, loaded with jet fuel fuel, that struck a massive steel and concrete building, literally causing the plane to spontaneously combust as it disintegrated upon impact?
Maybe someone can adequately explain how that passport not only survived in apparently decent condition, let alone legible condition, intact, but how it wasn't destroyed completely.
Login or register to post comments
Fri, 03/02/2012 - 14:47 | 2217716 Comay Mierda
Comay Mierda's picture
funny how they found these passports perfectly intact, but havent been able to find the black boxes from the planes for the last eleven years.
makes perfect sense.
Realist - Everybody in America is soft, and hates conflict. The cure for this, both in politics and social life, is the same -- hardihood. Give them raw truth.
| 
