I agree with her in the idea that the insurance companies shouldn't be FORCED to offer any sort of coverage. But that's a different discussion.
What a crackpot article. Something like 1 in 3 men who live beyond age 70 will have prostate cancer when they die (note I didn't say "will die of prostate cancer" - which is an entirely different thing). With so many other factors involved (heredity, etc), I seriously doubt they can definitively prove that birth control pills are the culprit. My father has prostate cancer, and I can guarantee you, his mother didn't take birth control.

What is the point of rules that are not enforced?