« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Buffett on gold

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 13 Feb 12 12:18 AM | 86 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 06646 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 06645 by faul)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

There you go with your sheeple again. Not everyone who disagrees with you is a sheep. But ideas have to emanate from somewhere. And we all tend to pursue the ones we think are good.

In this case, I think that on your own measure of market success to denote the correctness of an idea, Buffett is pretty much unassailable.

You still think that gold is the only form of value in an economy. I like Buffett's imagery on this topic:

"Over the past 15 years, both Internet stocks and houses have demonstrated the extraordinary excesses that can be created by combining an initially sensible thesis with well-publicized rising prices. In these bubbles, an army of originally skeptical investors succumbed to the "proof " delivered by the market, and the pool of buyers -- for a time -- expanded sufficiently to keep the bandwagon rolling. But bubbles blown large enough inevitably pop. And then the old proverb is confirmed once again: "What the wise man does in the beginning, the fool does in the end."

Today the world's gold stock is about 170,000 metric tons. If all of this gold were melded together, it would form a cube of about 68 feet per side. (Picture it fitting comfortably within a baseball infield.) At $1,750 per ounce -- gold's price as I write this -- its value would be about $9.6 trillion. Call this cube pile A.

Let's now create a pile B costing an equal amount. For that, we could buy all U.S. cropland (400 million acres with output of about $200 billion annually), plus 16 Exxon Mobils (the world's most profitable company, one earning more than $40 billion annually). After these purchases, we would have about $1 trillion left over for walking-around money (no sense feeling strapped after this buying binge). Can you imagine an investor with $9.6 trillion selecting pile A over pile B?"

By the way, I only just discovered that Warren is following my lead on gold. But I shall not charge him with his sheepiness towards my sagacity and gurutude.

For myself, I think gold is likely to do okay for a while longer, specially while the problems in Europe persist and the Chinese property bubble remains inflated. Whether the gold bubble pops or dissipates depends on the general state of fear and the quality of opportunities elsewhere in the marketplace.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: Buffett on gold
By: faul
in ALEA
Sun, 12 Feb 12 11:10 PM
Msg. 06645 of 54959

Alea......

O.K watchout for a spike in Gold within the next few months.
They always wheel out the Sage's & Guru's to bash the yellow
metal before a big rise......we shall see.

Gold purchasers buy on the fear that their purchasing power
is always greatly eroded by central bank money printing &
inflation....you buy gold to preserve your wealth only.

But knowing that the central banks sell upto 350 times
a claim on an oz of gold for every oz that exists & more
CB money printing should take us to about $55,000 an oz
before this is done.

When 1% of 1% of funds are invested in physical gold & silver
one could hardly call it a bubble....when the high streets &
internet,papers etc are full of ads offering to buy everyone's
gold it's hardly a bubble.......when you see a year or two of
those same entities selling gold to the public.....then we have
a bubble.

The sheeple blindly follow their Sage's & Guru's....

Doma.



« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next