« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: The USA's recovery from crisis

By: faul in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 30 Jan 12 11:51 PM | 41 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 06548 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 06547 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

A group of researchers working at the Human Genome Project indicate that they made an astonishing scientific discovery: They believe so-called 97% non-coding sequences in human DNA is no less than genetic code of extraterrestrial life forms.

The non-coding sequences are common to all living organisms on Earth, from moulds to fish to humans. In human DNA, they constitute larger part of the total genome, says Prof. Sam Chang, the group leader. Non-coding sequences, originally known as "junk DNA", were discovered years ago, and their function remained a mystery. The overwhelming majority of Human DNA is "Off-world" in origin. The apparent "extraterrestrial junk genes" merely "enjoy the ride" with hard working active genes, passed from generation to generation.

Artistic representation from Eyewitness testimony of Asket, the extraterrestrial human woman, reference: www.gaiaguys.net
After comprehensive analysis with the assistance of other scientists, computer programmers, mathematicians, and other learned scholars, Professor Chang had wondered if the apparently "junk Human DNA" was created by some kind of "extraterrestrial programmer". The alien chunks within Human DNA, Professor Chang further observes, "have its own veins, arteries, and its own immune system that vigorously resists all our anti-cancer drugs."

Professor Chang further stipulates that "Our hypothesis is that a higher extraterrestrial life form was engaged in creating new life and planting it on various planets. Earth is just one of them. Perhaps, after programming, our creators grow us the same way we grow bacteria in Petri dishes. We can't know their motives - whether it was a scientific experiment, or a way of preparing new planets for colonization, or is it long time ongoing business of seedling life in the universe."

Professor Chang further indicates that "If we think about it in our human terms, the apparent "extraterrestrial programmers" were most probably working on "one big code" consisting of several projects, and the projects should have produced various life forms for various planets. They have been also trying various solutions. They wrote "the big code", executed it, did not like some function, changed them or added new one, executed again, made more improvements, tried again and again."

Professor Chang's team of researchers furthermore concludes that, "The apparent "extraterrestrial programmers" may have been ordered to cut all their idealistic plans for the future when they concentrated on the "Earth project" to meet the pressing deadline. Very likely in an apparent rush, the "extraterrestrial programmers" may have cut down drastically on big code and delivered basic program intended for Earth."

Professor Chang is only one of many scientists and other researchers who have discovered extraterrestrial origins to Humanity.

Human Genome Project Coordinators find absolute proof of Extraterrestrial contact with 'Earth humans' via DNA evidence.
Professor Chang and his research colleagues show that apparent "extraterrestrial programming" gaps in DNA sequencing precipitated by a hypothesized rush to create human life on Earth presented humankind with illogical growth of mass of cells we know as cancer."

Professor Chang further indicates that "What we see in our DNA is a program consisting of two versions, a big code and basic code." Mr. Chang then affirms that the "First fact is, the complete 'program' was positively not written on Earth; that is now a verified fact. The second fact is, that genes by themselves are not enough to explain evolution; there must be something more in 'the game'."

"Soon or later", Professor Chang says "we have to come to grips with the unbelievable notion that every life on Earth carries genetic code for his extraterrestrial cousin and that evolution is not what we think it is."


- - - - -
View Replies (2) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: The USA's recovery from crisis
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Mon, 30 Jan 12 10:56 PM
Msg. 06547 of 54959

Hi faul,

Look, I understand and respect that you are trying to make sense out of the chaos and I sympathise with your process. The fact that you aren't necessarily persuading me is neither here nor there. Most of us create some kind of model that is the heart of what we believe about the universe.

I find mine a different way to you. And of course, I believe what I believe just as you do. You cannot expect it would be otherwise.

The way I examine every theory is the same. I ask questions. I look for anomalies. Where I find them, I assume I need to find another theory to explain the facts. I don't see this as a destructive process. I see it as a constructive one. I try to find facts upon which I can rely. Once I have them, I build the theory.

So your theory involves an external agency involved in the development of intelligence upon this planet. That's fine, but it's not easily susceptible to a test.

You think you find documentary evidence for it in ancient texts. Okay. I don't agree, but that is okay, right. I've read the books to a great extent and when I read them, I didn't think astronaut Gods. I thought primitive people believe strange things. I think that about Adam and Eve as well. So you can gang up with all the fundamentalist Christians against me if you wish!!

You think you find support in pre-history, and we can look at that. I think it is important to be precise, and the matter of 100,000 years is important. I'm not sure if you are claiming a 100,000 year old mine or a 200,000 year old one. So I could use a reference.

The earliest known mine I have discovered was in Swaziland. It is called the Lion's Gate. But it was carbon dated to 43,000 years ago and it was not a gold mine. Anatomically modern humans date from 200,000 years ago. So it looks like there's something of a gap there between the origin of a modern type of anatomical human and his mining activity. If you are an astronaut God, why wait 157,000 years to begin mining the gold after you have created homo sapiens?

In addition, I would also point out that Neanderthals mined flint. So the ability to mine is not something exclusive to Homo Sapiens.

I've looked up chromosome fusion. No mention of third party interference causing it that I could find - so again I could use help finding a reference. From what I have read, it appears that chromosomes sometimes fuse and sometimes split, and - as I read it - this happens for causes that are natural eg there's a similar situation with horses. This is interesting new knowledge for me.

As regards your demand for the missing link: golly, I don't know how granular you want to be, but it's sorta the nature of fossils that you don't get a record of daily changes. What palaeontologists appear to believe is that homo sapiens derives from homo erectus and that the evolution occurred fairly swiftly. This is what folks like Stephen Jay Gould call punctuated equilibrium. Others say that it's just as likely if not more so that apparently rapid evolution is explained by migration (the intermediate steps occurring in places where fossil creation is absent).

The old missing link argument occurred early in the history of Darwinian theory when there were no existing links between humans and apes and all we had was a theory. Then along came Lucy, Neanderthals and various other related human forms. And I guess now the demand is for links bridging these intermediate forms and homo sapiens.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next