« RANT II Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Democraps/ CJ

By: kathy_s16 in RANT II | Recommend this post (0)
Fri, 27 Jan 12 2:24 AM | 50 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Rant II
Msg. 19426 of 20747
(This msg. is a reply to 19382 by CTJ)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

When Barack Obama strides to the podium of the U.S. House of Representatives to offer his fourth (and hopefully last) State of the Union address on January 24, it will mark a milestone in government dysfunction.

And believe it or not, we’re referring to something other than the Obama administration’s disastrous handling of this country.

January 24 will mark the 1,000th day that’s passed since the Democratic-controlled U.S. Senate has approved a budget. Seriously … the Senate hasn’t passed a budget since April 29, 2009. Of course that 1,000-day streak isn’t entirely their faults – as the Democratic-controlled U.S. House was too busy shoving Obamacare down our throats to pass a budget in 2010.

Anyway, the result of all this dysfunction? A bunch of “continuing resolutions” that kick the can down the road month-by-month while the public is subjected to the occasional “government shutdown” threat (which, unfortunately, is never acted upon).

All this process does, of course, is to perpetuate a spending culture that continues to rack up trillions of dollars in deficits while refusing to prioritize government functions or address mushrooming entitlement obligations. In fact, 2012 will be the fifth year in a row in which the federal government spends more than $1 trillion in money that it doesn’t have … which would seem to indicate that this approach isn’t working.

So … will Obama make note of the 1,000 day anniversary when he addresses lawmakers?

What do you think?

Frankly, we’re not holding our breath that this president- who has failed to propose a single dime of savings since the debt debate began – will call attention to this colossal failure of leadership.

Why not? Because doing so would run counter to his partisan blame narrative.

That’s disappointing … and risky.

After all, despite its failure to hold fast to the fiscal principles its members were elected on, at least the Republican-controlled U.S. House of Representatives passed a budget last year.

http://www.fitsnews.com/2012/01/16/1000-days/


If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Democraps
By: CTJ
in RANT II
Tue, 24 Jan 12 12:58 AM
Msg. 19382 of 20747

President Barack Obama will deliver his fourth State of the Union address on Tuesday, January 24th–the very day that marks the 1,000th day since the Democrat-controlled United States Senate last bothered to pass a budget

To mark the inauspicious 1,000-day anniversary, the Heritage Foundation released a series of budget facts and urged the Senate to meet its Constitution requirements for fiscal stewardship:

The last time the Senate passed a budget was on April 29, 2009.

Since that date, the federal government has spent $9.4 trillion, adding $4.1 trillion in debt [annual interest payments on the debt now exceed $200 billion].

As of January 20, the outstanding public debt stands at $15,240,174,635,409.

Interest payments on the debt are now more than $200 billion per year.

President Obama proposed a FY2012 budget last year, and the Senate voted it down 97–0. (And that budget was no prize—according to the Congressional Budget Office, that proposal never had an annual deficit of less than $748 billion, would double the national debt in 10 years and would see annual interest payments approach $1 trillion per year.)

The Senate rejected House Budget Committee Chairman Paul Ryan’s (R–WI) budget by 57–40 in May 2011, with no Democrats voting for it.

In FY2011, Washington spent $3.6 trillion. Compare that to the last time the budget was balanced in 2001, when Washington spent $1.8 trillion ($2.1 trillion when you adjust for inflation).

Entitlement spending will more than double by 2050. That includes spending on Medicare, Medicaid and the Obamacare subsidy program, and Social Security. Total spending on federal health care programs will triple.

By 2050, the national debt is set to hit 344 percent of Gross Domestic Product.

Taxes paid per household have risen dramatically, hitting $18,400 in 2010 (compared with $11,295 in 1965). If the 2001 and 2003 tax cuts expire and more middle-class Americans are required to pay the alternative minimum tax (AMT), taxes will reach unprecedented levels.

Federal spending per household is skyrocketing. Since 1965, spending per household has grown by nearly 162 percent, from $11,431 in 1965 to $29,401 in 2010. From 2010 to 2021, it is projected to rise to $35,773, a 22 percent increase.

Sen. Harry Reid explained the Senate’s budgetary inaction by saying that it would be “foolish” to pass a budget.

Other Democrats, like Sen. Dick Durbin and Rep. Nancy Pelosi ,have argued that there’s no point in passing a budget that Republicans would filibuster. There’s only one problem with that argument: the Congressional Budget Act of 1974 made budgets entirely immune to filibusters and states that budgets may be passed with a simple majority.

Sen. Sessions and Rep. Ryan, both of whom have taken the lead in highlighting the Democrats’ budgetary mismanagement, challenged President Obama to use his State of the Union address to hold Democrats accountable for their inability to pass a budget:

The president and his party’s leaders have yet to detail a credible budget plan to prevent the fiscal crisis that awaits us should we continue down the current path to debt, doubt, and decline. Such a crisis would threaten the economic security, health security, and retirement security of every American. If the president wishes to begin a genuine dialogue with the American people in tomorrow’s State of the Union address, then he must hold his own party accountable for its dogged refusal to produce a plan to prevent this crisis and lift this cloud of uncertainty from the economy. The president must also deliver what he has so far refused: serious reforms to change our debt course and prevent fiscal disaster.

We remain disappointed in the Senate Democrats’ decision to give up on an essential responsibility of governing, and we sincerely hope 2012 will not mark the third consecutive year that Senate Democrats skip the budget process altogether. Nor will it be credible or acceptable for them to present a phony budget plan that pretends to make changes but in reality merely keeps spending on its current trajectory. Real reforms, real spending control, and a real change in the status quo are the minimum obligations of elected leaders in these times of uncertainty and distress. Where the president and his party have failed to confront the greatest challenges of our time, Republicans in the House and Senate will continue to work for solutions to ensure that government can keep its promises, take less from hardworking families and businesses, and create the conditions for economic growth and prosperity.

The dismal 1,000-day anniversary sets up a potential narrative for Republican Senate candidates to run against President Obama’s “Do-Nothing Democratic Senate.”

http://biggovernment.com/whall/2012/01/23/1000-days-since-the-democrat-controlled-senate-has-passed-a-budget/


« RANT II Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next