« RANT II Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: SOPA Controversy Explained

By: kathy_s16 in RANT II | Recommend this post (0)
Thu, 19 Jan 12 12:19 AM | 47 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Rant II
Msg. 19315 of 20747
(This msg. is a reply to 19314 by kathy_s16)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

SOPA and PIPA: The Basics


Media companies are always looking for new ways to fight piracy. They've tried suing individual users, getting Internet service providers to take action against subscribers, and working with the U.S. government to shut down domains based in the United States. But none of those actions can stop overseas websites such as The Pirate Bay and MegaUpload from infringing copyrights, or prevent Internet users from accessing those sites.

Enter SOPA, in the U.S. House of Representatives, and PIPA, in the U.S. Senate. Both bills are aimed at foreign websites that infringe copyrighted material. The bills are commonly associated with media piracy, but may also apply to counterfeit consumer goods and medication.

Originally, both bills provided two methods for fighting copyright infringement on foreign websites. In one method, the U.S. Department of Justice could seek court orders requiring Internet service providers to block the domain names of infringing sites. For example, Comcast could prevent its customers from accessing thepiratebay.org, although the underlying IP address would still be reachable. This ISP-blocking provision was a major concern among Internet security experts, and both SOPA and PIPA have dropped it.

The other tool would allow rights holders to seek court orders requiring payment providers, advertisers, and search engines to stop doing business with an infringing site. In other words, rights holders would be able to request that funding be cut off from an infringing site, and that search links to that site be removed. The site in question would have five days to appeal any action taken.

Although the House and Senate bills are similar, SOPA is the more extreme of the two. It defines a "foreign infringing site" as any site that is "committing or facilitating" copyright infringement, whereas PIPA is limited to sites with "no significant use other than" copyright infringement. More details on SOPA and PIPA are available through the Library of Congress website.


http://www.pcworld.com/article/248298/sopa_and_pipa_just_the_facts.html


If you think education is expensive, try ignorance.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
SOPA Controversy Explained
By: kathy_s16
in RANT II
Thu, 19 Jan 12 12:14 AM
Msg. 19314 of 20747

The Stop Online Piracy Act (SOPA) and Protect IP Act (PIPA) have been making headlines, but what are they, exactly? Here are the facts.
By Jared Newman, PCWorld

The Stop Online Piracy Act and the Protect IP Act are getting more negative attention, as major websites such as Wikipedia plan to protest the bills with blackouts on Wednesday. Even Google will join the action, with a link on its homepage explaining why the company opposes the legislation.

But what are SOPA and PIPA, exactly, and why are tech luminaries lambasting legislation aimed at stamping out copyright infringement? Read on for a full explanation.

http://www.pcworld.com/article/248298/sopa_and_pipa_just_the_facts.html


« RANT II Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next