Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: US Defense Secretary Admits "Iran Not Trying to Develop Nuclear Weapon" 

By: ribit in ROUND | Recommend this post (1)
Sat, 14 Jan 12 5:24 AM | 55 view(s)
Boardmark this board | De's Test Board 		Msg. 37997 of 45651
(This msg. is a reply to 37956 by Decomposed)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

decomp
700 billion a year is "cheap". Folks who have nothing worth stealing can get by with a weak military. The strong military is what keeps the global redistributionist at bay.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!

» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: US Defense Secretary Admits "Iran Not Trying to Develop Nuclear Weapon"
By: Decomposed in ROUND
Thu, 12 Jan 12 7:27 AM 		Msg. 37956 of 45651

re: 'if we were "significantly weaker" we would likely be involved in more wars, not less.'

Uh, okay. To back that up, can you cite one significantly weaker country that is involved in more wars than we are? Just one, please.

You see, ribit, when a country spends this sort of money on its military, VASTLY more than it needs for its actual DEFENSE, its leaders tend to seek justification for the expense. One doesn't typically spend $700 billion per year on something that one doesn't intend to use, does one? I mean, *I* wouldn't. Would you?

« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next