Forum Home | Log in | Signup | My Page | Rules | FAQ | Boards | Members | Search
« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Attack Dogs Unleashed on Ron Paul; No Need to Rethink Endorsement; Plus Side of Attack Dogs

By: Decomposed in ROUND | Recommend this post (0)
Tue, 27 Dec 11 5:22 PM | 37 view(s)
Boardmark this board | De's Test Board 		Msg. 37381 of 45651
(This msg. is a reply to 37380 by capt_nemo)
Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

re: "Then Paul walked out."

But it has now been shown that Paul did NOT "then walk out." Not the way it has been widely described, anyway - which suggests Paul was asked the question, got riled up and stormed off in a huff. The truth is, Ron Paul responded - for three minutes! At that point, the interview was winding down, the questions were repeating, and it ended. That's all. This was WIDELY misrepresented by the media.

Watch it for yourself. The unedited full CNN interview is here: http://www.youtube.com/watch?v=RLonnC_ZWQ0&feature=player_embedded

The part about the Ron Paul Report begins at 5'30" in the interview.

CNN has released the unedited interview. Ron Paul DID NOT STORM out.

Submitted by Han_Solo on Sat, 12/24/2011 - 10:05
in
Ron Paul 2012


*****************UNBELIEVABLE*******************
Ron Paul did not walk/storm out... the interview was over... it was an EIGHT MINUTE INTERVIEW!!

THIS WAS A CREATIVE EDITING HIT JOB


Full post: http://www.dailypaul.com/196334/cnn-released-unedited-interview-ron-paul-did-not-storm-out-it-was-a-creative-editing-hit-job




Avatar

Gold is $1,581/oz today. When it hits $2,000, it will be up 26.5%. Let's see how long that takes. - De 3/11/2013 - ANSWER: 7 Years, 5 Months


 - - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Attack Dogs Unleashed on Ron Paul; No Need to Rethink Endorsement; Plus Side of Attack Dogs
By: capt_nemo in ROUND
Tue, 27 Dec 11 8:34 AM 		Msg. 37380 of 45651

Attack dogs have finally been unleashed on Ron Paul. Those barking dogs caused Andrew Sullivan to Re-Think The Paul Endorsement

Time Magazine even launched a headline Paul Walks Away

No Need to Rethink Endorsement

There is no need to rethink endorsements. Here is the deal: Ron Paul did not say the things attributed to him. He denies them, disavows them, and most importantly, his voting record proves it!

Can anyone honestly tell me why things Ron Paul did NOT say over twenty years ago should be news today?

Paul Missed Best Tactic

How many times does he have to deny he wrote those things? Still, Ron Paul did not handle the CNN setup in the best possible manner.

This is what Paul said to CNN.

“Why don’t you go back and look at what I said yesterday on CNN and what I’ve said for 20 something years. 22 years ago? I didn’t write them, I disavow them."

That answer was perfectly fine, as far as it went. Then Paul walked out. It was a missed opportunity.

Proposed Follow-Up

Rather than walking out, Paul should have followed up with ...

"I'm not here to discuss imaginary

http://globaleconomicanalysis.blogspot.com/2011/12/attack-dogs-unleashed-on-ron-paul-no.html?utm_source=feedburner&utm_medium=feed&utm_campaign=Feed%3A+MishsGlobalEconomicTrendAnalysis+%28Mish%27s+Global+Economic+Trend+Analysis%29

« ROUND Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next