KillTheCat> Have you, or any other winger, ever read a copy of the NY Times?
KTC,
Some years ago now, my paper ran an editorial.
To the effect that once upon a time, the new
york times was the epitome of journalistic
excellence . . . but not any more.
The 'new york times' . . . can be more accurtely
described as the 'new york slimes'.
Chew on this, if you can.
A Blizzard of Lies in The New York Times
http://www.aim.org/guest-column/a-blizzard-of-lies-in-the-new-york-times/
December 27, 2010
It’s Orwellian when cold is declared warmth. It’s deceitful and insulting when it occurs in the midst of a huge blizzard shutting down much of the northeast.
I would not even trust the date on the front page of The New York Times because the newspaper long ago lost touch with reality, with sanity, and, one can only assume, readers fleeing to other sources for the news.
When the oft-called “newspaper of record” chooses a day on which Mother Nature is demonstrating what tons of snow and chill air can do to a huge swath of the nation’s northeast with effects reaching Tallahassee, they are either trying to see just how stupid their readers are or doubling down on the global warming hoax they have disseminated since Jim Hansen of NASA’s Goddard Institute declared we’re all doomed back in 1988.
If you want a lesson in Orwell’s “doublethink”, the ability to hold two contradictory thoughts or ideas at the same time, you need only read the first line of Cohen’s article: “The earth continues to get warmer, yet it’s feeling a lot colder outside.” In other words, who are you going to believe? Me? Or your lying eyes?
(Article does continue. Zim.)