« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: teecee Re: dzr (Whatever Apple currently has/will have they aren't worried) ...

By: Data_Rox in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 05 Dec 11 12:14 AM | 306 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 43899 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 43898 by Rakitno)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

then you think that the company did not comply with the ex-ante requests for 4G????

What is ex ante disclosures of licensing terms?

Ex ante disclosure of licensing terms is a mechanism about committing to licensing terms before the protected technology will be selected as part of a standard or in other words a mechanism about submitting anticipated licensing terms for a given standard draft before the contribution is locked-in as a standard. Ex ante disclosure of licensing terms should not be confused with:

- the disclosure of IPRs, which is the
notification to ETSI of essential or
potentially essential IPRs,
nor with
- the requested undertaking in writing
of an IPR owner that it is prepared to
grant licenses on fair, reasonable and
non-discriminatory terms and
conditions, pursuant to Clause 6.1 of
the ETSI IPR Policy.

Both are independent from the ex ante disclosures of licensing terms and are not replaced by the latter.

It is considered that licensing terms from such disclosures may, in some circumstances, improve transparency for individual Members in considering technologies for inclusion in standards.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: teecee Re: dzr (Whatever Apple currently has/will have they aren't worried) ...
By: Rakitno
in IDCC
Sun, 04 Dec 11 11:46 PM
Msg. 43898 of 48237

The patents sold for a higher price but a patents value is based upon the future cash flows they generate not by how much sugar and spice and everything nice that is used to make them. If the market value has changed how could the rates not change too. If the industry and standard setters seek for participants to lock in their rates for infinium regardless of any extraordinary dynamic events, which the Nortel auction was, then this game is rigged for the casino. They would like that but that's not fair and reasonable. These dynamic events would be the opt out. If no opt out exists, then why would anyone develop more patents for a standard whose shelf life is longer than anything you may currently have in your pipeline, if you have already locked in a rate on an entire portfolio.


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next