« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: teecee Re: dzr (Whatever Apple currently has/will have they aren't worried) ...

By: Rakitno in IDCC | Recommend this post (0)
Sun, 04 Dec 11 11:46 PM | 258 view(s)
Boardmark this board | InterDigital Communications
Msg. 43898 of 48237
(This msg. is a reply to 43896 by Data_Rox)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

The patents sold for a higher price but a patents value is based upon the future cash flows they generate not by how much sugar and spice and everything nice that is used to make them. If the market value has changed how could the rates not change too. If the industry and standard setters seek for participants to lock in their rates for infinium regardless of any extraordinary dynamic events, which the Nortel auction was, then this game is rigged for the casino. They would like that but that's not fair and reasonable. These dynamic events would be the opt out. If no opt out exists, then why would anyone develop more patents for a standard whose shelf life is longer than anything you may currently have in your pipeline, if you have already locked in a rate on an entire portfolio.


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: teecee Re: dzr (Whatever Apple currently has/will have they aren't worried) ...
By: Data_Rox
in IDCC
Sun, 04 Dec 11 11:19 PM
Msg. 43896 of 48237

I guess you can choose to think that the company made ex-ante RAND disclosures ....and then went back on it because the Nortel patents.....or any others... sold at auction for a higher "price" (not rate)???

do you think the SSOs and industry would allow the company to sit with them again? Maybe that's why nobody has signed in a long while?


« IDCC Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next