Thank you, loop, for taking the time to answer.
I had arrived at that site while clicking from one article to the next. What was of concern to me was that it was an opinion written by Judge Newman who is reported to be the one writting our opinion. The comment I highlighted in my previous post made me think of "gee, Is our CAFC taking so long because they are trying to find a way to have it go Nokia's way" ("What the CAFC is actively doing in several statute sections is creating self-contradictory case law, so as to more readily excercise bias towards large corporations..").
And then there was also this line: "The gratuitous expansive interpretation of §112 ¶ 6 here, creating conflicting precedents, lets the courts rule whichever way they please when close to the line."
This long period it is taking for our CAFC decision bothers me, in light of the many court decisions over the years that have sent IDCC on the appeal route. And, then there was that total surprise to Rambus in their Anti-trust ruling that just has me spooked, and thinking sinister thoughts about corruption, etc in the system.
Thanks again.
| 