Ah, poor clo ... trying to apologize for your own hypocrisy and racism by using a disingenuous strawman argument. ROTFLMAO!
"Monica was a willing participant."
Monica was a 22-year-old child when she was seduced by, penetrated with cigars by, ejaculated upon by, and then unceremoniously discarded as worthless trash by the sitting President of the United States, 49-year-old Billy Jeff Clinton. So, clo, do you really believe that the star-struck, naive Monica was as wholly responsible for the affair as the worldly, lecherous, serial-sexual-offender Billy Jeff Clinton? Would you feel the same way about it if, when you awake from your wet dreams of personally kneeling in front of Billy Jeff's crotch in the Oval Orifice, you discover that it was your 22-year-old daughter actually giving blow-jobs to Billy Jeff instead of you ... and he dismissively hung her out for public ridicule once it became expedient to do so?
"Besides, it's the conservative republicans that wear 'family values' as a badge of defiance."
Yeah, and when we are shown proof ... not unsubstantiated innuendo ... that any of our leaders are guilty of criminal acts, we remove our support from them and recommend they lose their position and be prosecuted for what they have done. You, on the other hand, you make all sorts of ridiculous excuses for ... usually involving the dishonest demonization of someone else ... and celebrate the bad behavior of your political leaders. No, clo ... you're simply a sick hypocrite.
If there is credible evidence to prove that Herman Cain has sexually assaulted women, then he needs to suffer the consequences of his actions. But, "credible" does not mean unsubstantiated, 14-year-old stories by women associated with Herman Cain's enemies who are looking for their 15-minutes of fame. You're gonna have to do much better that that to make a convincing argument.
B.
| 
