« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: Appeals court backs Obama healthcare law 

By: ribit in FFFT | Recommend this post (1)
Wed, 09 Nov 11 2:45 AM | 45 view(s)
Boardmark this board | Food For Further Thought
Msg. 35743 of 65535
(This msg. is a reply to 35713 by clo)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

clo
It was the latest victory for the Obama administration, which sought the new law to try to stem the soaring costs of healthcare and to increase coverage for the more than 35 million Americans without healthcare insurance.

...well we all know that none of that has happened. Costs have soared and there are more folks out there without insurance than before bozo took office.




Avatar

Liberals are like a "Slinky". Totally useless, but somehow ya can't help but smile when you see one tumble down a flight of stairs!


- - - - -
View Replies (1) »



» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Appeals court backs Obama healthcare law
By: clo
in FFFT
Tue, 08 Nov 11 11:21 PM
Msg. 35713 of 65535

Judge Laurence Silberman is a conservative appointed by Reagan ;))

Appeals court backs Obama healthcare law

By Jeremy Pelofsky and Lisa Lambert

WASHINGTON | Tue Nov 8, 2011 1:50pm EST

(Reuters) - President Barack Obama's signature healthcare law got a boost on Tuesday when an appeals court agreed with a lower court that dismissed a challenge and found the law's minimum coverage requirement was constitutional.

The Appeals Court for the District of Columbia Circuit upheld a lower court ruling that had found it constitutional to require Americans to buy healthcare insurance coverage by early 2014 or face a penalty and had dismissed a lawsuit challenging it.

"It certainly is an encroachment on individual liberty, but it is no more so than a command that restaurants or hotels are obliged to serve all customers regardless of race ... or that a farmer cannot grow enough wheat to support his own family," wrote Judge Laurence Silberman in the majority opinion, citing past federal mandates that inspired legal fights.

"The right to be free from federal regulation is not absolute, and yields to the imperative that Congress be free to forge national solutions to national problems, no matter how local -- or seemingly passive -- their individual origins."

It was the latest victory for the Obama administration, which sought the new law to try to stem the soaring costs of healthcare and to increase coverage for the more than 35 million Americans without healthcare insurance.

more:

http://www.reuters.com/article/2011/11/08/us-healthcare-court-idUSTRE7A74PO20111108


« FFFT Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next