« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next

Re: cat

By: Cactus Flower in ALEA | Recommend this post (0)
Mon, 07 Nov 11 7:37 PM | 36 view(s)
Boardmark this board | The Trust Matrix
Msg. 06199 of 54959
(This msg. is a reply to 06198 by Cactus Flower)

Jump:
Jump to board:
Jump to msg. #

But rather than admit that the argument you produced was wrong, why not do the normal: never admit it; never try to justify it; just disappear and hope time brings you relief.

Never learn. Never admit a mistake. Deny the evidence. Open end "the game". etc.

Because whatever happens, being wrong is just impossible.

Right?

There's a little person sitting on your shoulder tells you that you cannot just surrender on an issue - even one that is untenable in every way.

Admit it though, and there's a chance you will open up your mind to truth. I don't think you can do it. But I can hope.




» You can also:
- - - - -
The above is a reply to the following message:
Re: cat
By: Cactus Flower
in ALEA
Mon, 07 Nov 11 7:27 PM
Msg. 06198 of 54959

Reminds me a little of some of the Wavoids.

They are told from the unsafe harbour to get excited because Wave's software is about to be adopted. "We own Europe", "June is ours." etc. They say - our time has come.

Other folks say, look, this is a long road with obstacles in it. Don't get too excited. Wait for some signs of progress in the numbers. Look for the empirical evidence, not the puff.

Yet these cautions are inevitably dismissed.

A decade goes by.

Finally, things look like they are turning in a better direction. Obstacles finally navigated. And the optimistic Wavoids, whose theories predicted nothing but imminent success, shout in unison - "Vindication! At last."

Irony!

If we enter an inflationary environment in two years, I wasn't wrong about the past. The right policy in 2008-2011 was to acknowledge the reality we have existed in and to develop the policies to combat it. The problem we have faced is the failure of demand in a deflationary environment in which asset values have collapsed (stocks, houses) and trust in the financial system has eroded significantly. The government needed to respond. QE was one of these responses. Stimulus was another. There was little time to produce perfection, and indeed, what was produced was over the objections of the Republican party.

It's rather pitiful to think this is a game and that the game is still on. Economies are managed in real time and have real consequences for people. The present is the issue. The game analogy, with its time component (waiting for circumstances to change to justify a position which was applied to earlier circumstances), is just a form of denial by delay.


« ALEA Home | Email msg. | Reply to msg. | Post new | Board info. Previous | Home | Next